/31 vs /32 — Subnet Comparison

A /31 subnet is larger than a /32. Every additional bit in the prefix halves the address space — the 1-bit difference between these two means /31 has 21 = 2 times as many addresses.

/31

2 host addresses — RFC 3021 P2P

Full reference →
Total IPs 2
Usable Hosts 2
Subnet Mask 255.255.255.254
Wildcard Mask 0.0.0.1

Typical Uses

  • Point-to-point link (more efficient than /30)
  • Router interface addressing with RFC 3021 support
  • BGP peering links
/32

Single host address

Full reference →
Total IPs 1
Usable Hosts 1
Subnet Mask 255.255.255.255
Wildcard Mask 0.0.0.0

Typical Uses

  • Host route in routing table
  • Loopback interface address
  • Security group rule for a single IP

Key Differences

more IPs in /31 than /32
2
/32 subnets fit inside one /31
1
bit of difference in prefix length

How 2 /32 Subnets Divide a /31

Example using 10.0.0.0/31 as the parent block.

# CIDR Network First Usable Last Usable Broadcast Hosts
1 10.0.0.0/32 10.0.0.0 10.0.0.0 10.0.0.0 10.0.0.0 1
2 10.0.0.1/32 10.0.0.1 10.0.0.1 10.0.0.1 10.0.0.1 1

FAQ

What is the difference between /31 and /32?

A /31 has 2 usable hosts and a /32 has 1. The subnet masks differ: /31 uses 255.255.255.254 while /32 uses 255.255.255.255. Every additional bit in the prefix halves the number of addresses — so the 1-bit gap means /31 is exactly 2× larger.

How many /32 subnets fit in a /31?

Exactly 2 /32 subnets fit perfectly inside one /31 with no wasted space. To split a /31 into /32s, just increment the last 1 bit of the network address for each new subnet.

Which should I choose?

/31 is typically used for: Modern P2P links (RFC 3021). /32 is better for: Single host — firewall rules, host routes. Choose the smallest prefix that comfortably fits your host count — over-allocating wastes address space, but under-allocating means painful renumbering later.

Related Comparisons